IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. Pathak, J.
Tarun Kumar - Petitioners
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 5700 of 2018 With W.P.(S) No. 2715 of 2019 With W.P.(S) No. 3816 of 2019 With W.P.(S) No. 132 of 2021, With W.P.(S) No. 1011 of 2021, W.P.(S) No. 1887 of 2021
Decided On : 11-04-2022
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 - Jharkhand Government High School and Teaching Staff Appointment and Service Conditions Rules, 2015 - Rule 9 (i) - Power of High court to issue certain writs - Vacancies reserved for Primary School Teachers - Held, In the present pandemic scenario, when everything has been put to a halt, giving no scope for employment, the process of selection in the non-scheduled districts cannot be put to halt for an indefinite periods - It has to come to a logical end - The recruitment process has to be concluded by publication of results and issuance of appointment letters as per the eligibility criteria and vacancy position, in accordance with law - The entire exercise of appointments shall be concluded within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order - Writ petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.
1. Since in all these writ petitions, common issue for issuing the final result/appointment letter on the post Trained Graduate Teacher in non-scheduled districts of Jharkhand, pursuant to Advertisement No. 21/2016 is involved, they are heard together and are being disposed of this common order.
2. Heard the parties.
Prayers
3. In W.P.(S) No. 5700 of 2018 & W.P.(S) No. 3816 of 2019, similar prayer has been sought for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for appointments on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher, pursuant to Advertisement No. 21/2016, against the vacant seats of 25% of the vacancies reserved for Primary School Teachers in terms of Rule 9 (i) of the Jharkhand Government High School and Teaching Staff Appointment and Service Conditions Rules, 2015.
4. In W.P.(S) No. 2715 of 2019, the petitioner has challenged the Notice No. 3462 dated 17.5.2019 (Annexure-10), whereby the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher in subject Physical Education has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the required educational certificate. After quashment of the Notice, the petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher, pursuant to Advertisement No. 21/2016, as he had obtained the Graduation degree in Bachelor of Computer Application from a recognised Institute.
5. In W.P.(S) No. 132 of 2021, petitioners have sought for a direction upon the respondent Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission to recommend their names for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT), in subject Music, pursuant to Advertisement No. 21/2016 and consequently to issue appointment letters to the petitioners.
6. In W.P.(S) No. 1887 of 2021 and W.P.(S) No. 1011 of 2021, petitioners have sought for a direction upon the respondents, in particular respondent-State to issue appointment letters on the post of Trained Graduate Teachers in subject Sanskrit, as their names find place in the final merit list and have been already recommended by Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission.
Factual Matrix in W.P.(S) No. 5700 of 2018 & 3816 of 2019
7. Brief facts as delineated in W.P.(S) No. 5700 of 2018 are that the State of Jharkhand, under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, framed ‘Jharkhand Government High School Teacher and Teaching Staff Appointment and Service Conditions Rules, 2015’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Said Rules,2015’). Rule 9 (i) thereof provides that in case, 25% seats are not filled up by eligible Govt. Primary School Teacher, having five years of experience, the same shall be filled up from direct appointment.
8. The State of Jharkhand issued the notification and order, bearing Notification No. 5938 and Order No. 5939 dated 14.7.2016, whereby it has been provided inter alia that in the 13 scheduled districts of the State i.e. the districts of Sahebganj, Pakur, Dumka, Jamtara, Latehar, Ranchi, Khunti, Gumla, Lohardaga, Simdega, East Singhbhu, West Singhbhum and Seraikella-Kharsawan, only the local residents of the concerned scheduled districts shall be eligible for appointment on the District Cadre Class-III and Class-IV posts for a period of ten years from the date of issuance of notification.
9. Thereafter, strictly in terms of the aforesaid Rules, 2015, the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission published district-wise vacancies, being Advertisement No. 21/2016, captioned as ‘Combined Trained Graduate Teacher Competitive Examination-2016’, for appointment of Trained Graduate Teachers in different subjects. In paragraph 5(iii) of the Advertisement, it has been stated that so far as vacancies in the scheduled districts of the State are concerned, only the local residents of those scheduled districts shall be eligible to apply.
10. The petitioners being eligible in all respects applied for the said
State of Haryana Vs. Subash Chander Marwaha
Shankarsan Dash Vs. Union of India
All India SC & ST Employees Assn. Vs. A Arthur Jeen
Punjab State Electricity Board and Ors. Vs. Malkiat Singh
State of Orissa Vs. Rajkishore Nanda
Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha
The main legal point established in the judgment is that candidates who have secured more marks than the last selected candidates are entitled to be considered for counseling and appointment, especia....
The court held that the previous judgments regarding technical/professional courses did not apply to the degrees obtained by the petitioners, and ordered the issuance of conditional appointment lette....
Candidates on a merit list do not have an indefeasible right to appointment if they fail to meet the prescribed cut-off marks, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes.
(1) 100% reservation provided for local residents of concerned Scheduled Districts / Areas only would be violative of Article 16(2) of Constitution of India.(2) Quality of education of school-going c....
The court balanced the legal right accrued to the writ petitioners with the equitable relief to the appellants, considering the appointments in Udhampur District.
Candidates must fulfill requisite qualifications at the time of appointment; failure to do so renders the appointment void ab initio.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.