SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 643

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Satyajit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Govind Jee, Adv. Mr. Omanakuttan K. K., AOR Mr. Govind Jee, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Kiran Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shiv Ram Pandey, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr..Vikas Singh (Sr ADV) Mr.Rajeev Dhavan (Sr Adv) Mr.R Venkatramani (Sr ADV) Mr.P.S.Patwalia (Sr Adv) Ms.Vibha Datta Makhija (Sr Adv) Mr. Prashant Shukla Adv Mr. Suyash Srivastava Adv Ms.Shreya Mishra, Adv. Mr.Praveen Gaur Adv Mr. Karan Mamagain, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Chitwan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Praveen Vivnesh, Adv. Ms. Pratibha Shukla, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Shanker Singh, Adv Mr. Shonak Sharma, Adv Ms. Aaina Walia, Adv Mr. Priyank Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Naresh k Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Ravi Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Shantanu, Adv. Mr. Amit, Adv. Ms. Vani Vyas, Adv. M/s Ravi Chandra Prakash & Co., AOR Mr. Kabir Dixit, AOR Mr. Gopal Sankarnaraynan, Sr Adv Mr. Amit Agrawal, AOR Mr. Vigyan Shah, Adv Ms. Radhika Yadav, Adv Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, AOR Ms. Manju Singh, Adv. Mr. Tarun Verma, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Varun T, Adv. Mr. Anilendra Pandey, AOR Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kumar Anurag, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Ms. Rohini Prasad, AOR Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, AOR Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Swarup, Adv. M/S. Manoj Swarup And Co., AOR Mr. Priyank Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Shomila Bakshi, AOR Mr. Piyush Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Vikram Singh Kushwaha, Adv. Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Y.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR

JUDGMENT

M.R. Shah, J.

1.0. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 21.09.2020 passed in Writ Petition No.1387 of 2017 and other allied writ petitions and connected applications, by which, the High Court has allowed said writ petitions and has observed, held and declared that the Notification No.5938 and the Order No.5939 dated 14.07.2016 issued by the State of Jharkhand and Advertisement No.21 of 2016 dated 28.12.2016 modified by the Advertisement No.21 of 2016 published on 04.12.2017, by the State Government through Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha inviting application for appointment to the posts of Trained Graduate Teacher in the Government Secondary Schools to the extent of making 100% reservation for the local candidates/residents of Thirteen Scheduled Areas in the State of Jharkhand as illegal, ultra vires and unconstitutional and consequently has quashed the appointments of the Trained Graduate Teachers made pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, in the Scheduled Districts relating to the local residents of those Districts, the original respondents – candidates belonging to the Thirteen Scheduled Dist


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top