RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Basant Kumar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The similar issue fell for consideration in all these writ petitions, therefore, these matters have been listed together and have been heard and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The instant writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein, the direction has been sought for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing of Clause-7 of the Notification contained in Memo No.4054 dated 19.07.2018, by which, the aforesaid notification has been made applicable prospectively and therefore, the petitioners have been deprived of the benefits of the amendment carried out by virtue of the aforesaid notification.
3. The facts leading to filing of these cases on behalf of the petitioner are that they had appeared for the limited examination conducted by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, hereinafter referred to as “JSSC”, in pursuant to Advertisement No.09/2017 for filling up of the posts of constable.
4. The advertisement contains a condition about minimum qualifying marks to be scored in paper-II and paper-III in the OMR based examination for the various category, as referred herein :-
A.A. Calton Vrs. Director of Education and Anr.
Government of Orissa Vrs. Haraprasad Das & Ors.
Jatinder Kumar v. State of Punjab
Neelima Shangla v. State of Haryana
P. Mohanan Pillai Vrs. State of Kerala & Ors.
Shankarsan Dash Vrs. Union of India
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.