SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 702

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ram Raj Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Pandey.
For the State : Mr. P.D. Agarwal, Spl.P.P

JUDGMENT :

1. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 01.07.2021 arising out of Itki P.S.Case No.31 of 2015 (s) whereby process under section 82 Cr.P.C against the petitioners has been issued and the case is pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-XIV at Ranchi.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not been named in the F.I.R and they have not received any notice and they were not knowing about the case and all of a sudden by the order dated 01.07.2021, they came to know about the case.

4. Mr. P.D. Agarwal, the learned counsel for the respondent State by way of referring paragraph no.11 of the petition has submitted on 03.01.2022 that the petitioners have stated that they have applied for obtaining the entire certified copy of the F.I.R in connection with Itki P.S.Case No.31 of 2015(S) from the concerned court but for the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top