SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Dharmender Ray, S/o. Surendra Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the State.
2. This petition has been filed for direction upon the respondents to release the vehicle of the petitioners bearing registration no. as PW-1 (WB 11D 2683), PW-2 (WB 11C 2430), PW-3 (WB 23B 7111) and PW -4 (WB 23B 6528) which has been seized in connection with Syamsunderpur PS Case No.07/2021 (G.R.Case No.181/2021), pending in the court of learned SDJM, Ghatshila.
3. That the recourse of the law set on motion on the basis of self statement of SI, Kajal Kumar Dubey that he got a secret information on 9.3.2021 at about 11 pm that animals are being illegally transported from Bihar to Bengal. On the above information he with other police personnel reached near the boundary of Shamsunderpur they blocked the road and started checking at about 1 am. That it is alleged that several trucks, pickup vans came there and on asking they found that animals were loaded and no paper was produced by the drivers of few trucks and few was able to flee away from the place of occurrence. Thereafter those trucks searched and found several animals were tied with ropes and then all the
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Uday Singhwith analogous cases
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the forfeiture of vehicles under the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughtering Act, 2005 can only occur after a trial concludes and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a finding of contravention before forfeiture of a vehicle under the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughtering Act, 20....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a finding of contravention before forfeiture of a vehicle under the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughtering Act, 20....
Release of Vehicle - Beef slaughter - Transportation of Cattle or Beef - Whenever a vehicle is found to have been used in transportation of Cattle or Beef contravening any provision of this Act Vehic....
The Act does not provide for confiscation of the vehicle, and forfeiture can only occur after a trial concludes with a conviction. The commercial nature of the vehicle and relevant legal provisions a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 12(3) of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughtering Act, 2005, regarding the forfeiture of a vehicle to ....
The court's decision was based on the lack of initiation of confiscation proceedings for the seized vehicle under the Rajasthan Bovine Act, 1955, and the potential damage from continued detention.
Prompt action under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. is necessary to avoid keeping seized property at police stations for a long time, and seized vehicles should be released when ownership is not disputed.
Seized vehicles must be released to owners unless confiscation proceedings are initiated; conditions include deposit of bank guarantees and ensuring no illegal use.
The main legal point established is that practical considerations and safeguarding of interests can be balanced with the legal mandate, providing a solution that serves both parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.