ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
M. P. Madhup, son of Ramautar Poddar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation, Ranchi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
2. The appellant-convict has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 09.05.2002, passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-II-cum-Special Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi in R.C. Case No. 22 (A)/93-(R) whereby and where under, the learned court below has held the appellant-convict guilty for the offences punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and has sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two and half years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offences punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and in case of default of payment of fine, further sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three months. Further, the appellant-convict has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two and half years and to pay a fine of Rs.7,000/- for the offences punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and in case of default of payment of fine, further sentenced to
Som Prakash vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1992 SC 665
Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab
Khem Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery of bribe money, when unchallenged, is sufficient to establish the charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The evidence in the record is sufficient to establish the charges for the offences punishable under Section 7 as well as Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac....
Illegal gratification – Mere possession and recovery of currency notes from accused without proof of demand would not establish an offence under Section 7 as well as Sections 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of ....
Establishing demand and acceptance of bribe is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act; failure to prove these elements results in acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.