NAVNEET KUMAR
Sikandar Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Learned counsel Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha is present on behalf of the appellants and learned APP appearing for the State Mr. Bishambhar Shastri is present on behalf of the State. Today also nobody appears on behalf of the O.P. No.2.
2. Heard the parties.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that this Cr.M.P. has been filed to quash the order dated 06.09.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) No. 1 cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, in Complaint Case No. 522/2012 by which, the cognizance for the offences under Sections 498-A, 379 and 504 of IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken against all the accused persons/ petitioners and further prayer to set-aside the entire criminal proceeding arising out of the aforesaid complaint case No. 522 of 2012.
4. It has further been pointed out by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, inter alia, that it is a matrimonial dispute between the husband and the wife for causing cruelty and torture for want of fulfillment of demand of dowry, for which, a complaint case was filed by the opposite party No.2 Najra Khatoon vide complaint case No.52
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.