DEEPAK ROSHAN
Bansi Lal Hazam – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This revision application is directed against the judgment dated 29.08.2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal No.180 of 1998; whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.11.1998 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in G.R. No.2065 of 1992, T.R. No.655 of 1998; whereby the petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 25(1-b)(a) & 26 (1) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo R.I for one year for each of the above offence and directed to run both the sentences concurrently; has been affirmed and the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed .
3. The prosecution case in short is that on 1.6.1992 one Mr. R.N. Kunwar, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police along with other official posted at Bank More Police Station, while searching at about 1.00 P.M., a Tata Model 608 vehicle bearing No. WB-55-0322 was seen coming rashly. It was stopped by the police and the driver was asked to produce the papers of the vehicle. The driver took out the papers one by one from the rekine bag in suspicious condition. On suspicion the informant took the bag in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.