ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Amalgam Steel and Power Ltd. (formerly known as Adhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Jitendra Singh, learned Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rohitashya Roy, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. Heard Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Senior Advocate along with learned counsels Mr. Indrajit Sinha and Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocates, appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 4.
3. Heard Mr. Deepankar Roy, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent-State, who has supported the arguments of Respondent No.4
4. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 04.12.2020 (Annexure-19) as contained in Memo No. 1539 passed by the Respondent No. 2 in Misc. Case No. 213 of 2020-21, passed under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure whereby the Petitioner company has been directed to restore the water supply to respondent No. 4, company.
A further prayer has been made to restrain the respondent No. 2 from interfering in any manner in commercial/private dispute between the Petitioner and respondent No. 4.
5. The foundational admitted facts are as under: -
b) Adhunik Pow
C.A. Avarachan vs. C.V. Sreenivasan and Anr.
Carona Ltd. vs. Parvathy Swaminathan and Sons. Reported in (2007) 8 SCC 559
Gobind Singh vs. Shanti Sarup reported in (1979) 2 SCC 267 Para 6 and 7.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Another vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Punjab State Electricity Board Ltd. vs. Zora Singh and Others reported in (2005) 6 SCC 776
Ritesh Tewari and Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.