W. DIENGDOH
Ramesh Bawri – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proceedings initiated under section 133 cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. jurisdiction issues and empowerment under section 133. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments against jurisdiction and private nature of dispute. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 4. petitioner’s acceptance of jurisdiction questioned. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court's view on jurisdictional validity. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 6. proceedings quashed due to jurisdiction issues. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 7. potential for public nuisance complaints. (Para 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT :
1. A proceeding numbered as Executive Proceeding No. 2 of 2022 under Section 133 Cr.P.C is being conducted by the learned Executive Magistrate (respondent No. 3), in Ri Bhoi District of Meghalaya. The said proceeding is directed towards the petitioner herein who allegedly on a verbal order passed by the said learned Executive Magistrate on 04.04.2023, was directed to shut down all the business operation within his premises, housing as many as 42 tenants.
2. These proceedings including the said order dated 04.04.2023 are impugned herein in this instant petition under Section 397 read with Section 482 and 401 Cr.P.C with a prayer to set aside and quash the
Embassy Property Developments Private Limited. v State of Karnataka & Ors.: (2020) 13 SCC 308
Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. DLF Universal Ltd. & Anr.: (2005) 7 SCC 791
Proceedings under Section 133 Cr.PC require evidence of public nuisance; private disputes cannot be adjudicated under this provision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the scope and procedure of Sec. 133 of Cr.P.C. in addressing public nuisance and the requirement for recording reasons for administrative decisions....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict interpretation and application of Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing the need for eminent danger to the property....
The court emphasized that a conditional order under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. is mandatory for initiating proceedings, and failure to comply renders subsequent actions invalid.
The court established that the exercise of power under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C. is justified in cases of imminent danger to public safety, and such powers can be exercised even in the context of pr....
Section 152 BNSS requires proper conditional order, evidence inquiry before absolutism; spot inspection invalid substitute. Cannot compel private land use for public projects without acquisition; pro....
A conditional order under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is essential before final orders can be issued, but temporary measures can be taken to ensure public safety pending investigati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.