JUDGMENT :

Heard the parties.

2. This second appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree of concurrence dated 3.02.2007 passed by the Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in Title Appeal No.80 of 1987 by which the learned first appellate court has dismissed the suit of the plaintiffappellant and held that the judgment and decree by which the Title Suit No.70 of 1975 passed by the trial court being the court of Additional Munsif, Ranchi requires no interference.

3. The case of the plaintiff-appellant in brief is that the suit land has been recorded in the name of Fauda Mahato and Karinath Mahato and consequent upon the partition between them, the suit plot fell in the share of Fauda Mahato. There was a dispute between Fauda Mahato on the one hand and Bimal Das Gupta and Mathura Singh Ramnath Singh on the other hand which led Fauda Mahato to file Title Suit No.92 of 1967 in the court of Sub-ordinate Judge, Ranchi. The said Title Suit No.92 of 1967 was compromised and by virtue of the said compromise entered into between the parties in Title Suit No.92 of 1967, Bimal Das Gupta and Mathur Singh Ramnath Singh acquired titl