Back
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Sher Ali Ansari S/o Late Gani Ansari – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Both the appeals have been tagged together in pursuance of order dated 25.11.2021 and as such, are being heard together.
I.A. No. 8049 of 2019 in L.P.A. No. 542 of 2019
I.A. No. 8356 of 2019 in L.P.A. No. 566 of 2019
2. Both the appeals are barred by limitation, as such, separate applications have been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 269 days in filing L.P.A. No. 542 of 2019 and 278 days in filing L.P.A. No. 566 of 2019 taking similar grounds as such, both the applications are being heard together and are being dealt with by this common order.
3. It has been stated in the interlocutory applications that due to complete inadvertence and oversight as also due to Durga Puja, Deepawali and Chhath Festival it slipped out from the mind of appellants and its office staff to enquire from their Government Counsel with regard to present position of writ petitions.
It has been further stated that after passing of order dated 25.10.2018 (impugned), no communication was made to the office of the appellants by their counsel and as such, they were completely ignorant about the order dated 25.10.2018 passed by this Court in writ petitions.
The further ground
The court reaffirmed that the notification under the Indian Forest Act validly vested land with the State, and the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside unchallenged notifica....
Settlement of forest land is void without prior Central approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act; a jurisdictional error does not validate an illegal title.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the power of the State Government to reserve forest land or wasteland under Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the consequences of vesti....
The settlement claim must be substantiated with relevant documents in a summary proceeding.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the 1960 notification declaring the land as 'reserved forest' was illegal and invalid, and the Bhoodan Committee had no right to transfer the ....
Notice under Section 35(3) IFA for MPFA vesting must be by authorised officer, served on true owner pre- or proximately to appointed day; invalid notice fails strict compliance, preventing land class....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the settlement made in favor of the vendors of the writ petitioners had already attained finality by the order of the Patna High Court, and th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
