SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 22

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Raj Kumar Tewary – Appellant
Versus
Asha Kumari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate, Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.

Heard Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar assisted by Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Atanu Banerjee assisted by Mr. Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This second appeal has been preferred being dissatisfied with the decree sealed and signed on 18.02.2003 on the basis of the judgment dated 27.01.2003 in Partition Appeal No. 16 of 1997 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. II, Palamau at Daltonganj affirming the decree sealed and signed on 02.04.1997 on the basis of the judgment dated 15.03.1997 in Partition Suit No. 41 of 1989 by the learned Sub-Judge No. 2, Daltonganj.

3. The appellants/plaintiffs instituted suit for partition to the extent of 1/5th share of the plaintiffs, cost of the suit and another reliefs deemed fit and proper. The said suit was decided by the learned Sub-Judge No. 2, Daltonganj vide judgment dated 15.03.1997 and he has been pleased to dismiss the suit. Against that judgment, the appellants/plaintiffs moved before the learned appellate court in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top