SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SUBHASH CHAND
Gopal Bouri – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director – Respondent
ORDER :
[Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.]
1. Office has pointed out the defect that the court fee to the tune of Rs. 20/- has not been deposited by the appellant.
2. Considering the aforesaid defect, office is directed to supply the certified copy to the appellant subject of deposit of court fee to the tune of Rs. 20/-
I.A. No. 6295 of 2015:
3. This interlocutory application has been filed for condoning the delay of 373 days, which has occurred in preferring this appeal.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Having regard to the averments made in this application, we are of the view that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the period of limitation.
6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 6295 of 2015 is allowed and the delay of 373 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.
L.P.A. No. 646 of 2015:
7. The instant appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 02.09.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4752 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, the claim of the writ petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground on account of death of his father, who died in harness on 23.12.1994, which had been rejected
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.