SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SUBHASH CHAND
A. Ramji Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant intra-court appeal, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 10.11.2009 passed in W.P. (C) No. 234 of 2003 whereby and whereunder the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has refused to interfere with order dated 28.04.2001 passed by Special Officer, Scheduled Area Regulation (SAR), Ranchi in SAR Case No. 139/1998-99, appended as Annexure 4 to the writ petition; order dated 03.06.2002 passed by appellate authority in SAR Appeal No. 27R/01-02, appended as Annexure 5 to the writ petition; and order dated 01.10.2002 passed by revisional authority in SAR No. 102/2002-2003, appended as Annexure 6 to the writ petition; by which the application filed by respondent no. 5 before original authority for restoration of land under Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred as to as ‘Act, 1908’) has been allowed with a direction to restore the land forthwith in favour of respondent no. 5.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per pleadings made in the writ petition, read as hereunder:
3. The appellants-writ petitioners are alleged to be the heirs and successors of their late elder brother-R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.