SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Krishna Kisku – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder the order dated 16.02.2016 passed by the Respondent No.4 in Land restoration Case No.17/2013-14 by which the claim of restoration of the land in question filed under Section 71A of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 has been rejected. Further, the order dated 19.02.2021 by which the order dated 16.02.2016 has been quashed by the appellate authority by passing order in L.R. Appeal No.4/2016 as also the order dated 28.01.2022 passed by the revisional authority in Land Restoration Revision Case No.48/21 quashing the order passed by the appellate authority, have been sought to be quashed.
2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings made in the writ petition, which are required to be enumerated herein, read as under :-
The land measuring 0.68 acre situated at Plot number 3194, 3196, 3197, 3264, 3265, 3266, 3267, 3268 and 3269 Khata No.29 Mouza Dhaiya within Dhanbad Sub Division recorded in name of Keshaw Manjhi and others (Predecessor of petitioners) in Cadestral Survey Khatiyan and as such the land is amenable under the provision of Section 71(A) of Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act.
It is the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.