Back
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Rakesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents along with Mr. Sujit Kumar Lala, Advocate.
3. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs : -
(ii) For quashing of letter dated 18 October, 2014 as contained in Annexure-10/1 to the writ petition subsequently a corrigendum has be
The punishment imposed must be in accordance with the prescribed list of punishments under the relevant rules and should not deviate from the statutory provisions.
Termination without proper procedure and documentation is disproportionate, violating legal norms on employee's rights.
Unauthorized absence from duty must be proven willful to constitute misconduct; penalties must be proportionate to the offense and consider the employee's service record.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
