IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
Aashik Miyan @ Ashik Miyan and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 5897 of 2018
Decided On : 11-05-2023
Private Protected Forest - Revision of Map and Notification under Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 - Section 47
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought direction to revise the map and publish a notification under Section 47 of the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 for release of land from private protected forests. The respondents opposed, claiming the land was uncultivable and had been declared as protected forest in 1955.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, stating that the land was declared as protected forest under the Act, 1927, and the Act, 1947 would not apply to the land in respect of which the provisions of the Act, 1927 are in force.
Issues: The main issue was the applicability of the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 to the land in question, and the validity of the petitioners' claim for revision of the map and publication of notification under Section 47.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Act, 1947 would not apply to the land in respect of which the provisions of the Act, 1927 are in force, and the petitioners' claim based on the order for release of the land was not valid.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed with the observation that the petitioners were not entitled to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
ORDER :
The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities to revise the map and to publish a notification under Section 47 of the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1947”) in terms with order dated 21.08.1949 passed by the then Forest Settlement Officer, Chatra, District-Hazaribagh under Section 23 of the Act, 1947 in Case No. 113/73 of 1949-50 for release of 30 acres of land appertaining to Plot Nos. 139 and 145 of village Bhaipur, Thana No. 119, P.S.- Chatra, District-Hazaribagh (now Chatra) (hereinafter referred to as “the said land”) from the limits of the private protected forests and also in pursuance of the letter as contained in memo no. 636 dated 11.02.1985 issued by the Special Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar to the Chief Conservator of Forest, the erstwhile State of Bihar at Ranchi conveying that his recommendation made vide letter no. 5417 dated 26.07.1984 for release of the said land from the limits of the private protected forests was approved by the State Government.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said land was recorded in the Record of Rights as Gairmazarua Khas under the Tenure Holder/Zamindar – Jagarnath Sahay. After death of the said Tenure Holder/Zamindar, all his estates were inherited by his legal heirs and successors including Babu Bisheshwar Sahay, who got the said land in his share. After demise of Babu Bisheshwar Sahay, his legal heirs and successors inherited his property and the said land came in the share of Babu Krishna Ballabh Sahay. In the meantime, the said land was declared as private protected forest under the provisions of the Act, 1947. Thereafter, Babu Krishna Ballabh Sahay submitted an application under Section 23 of the Act, 1947 to the Forest Settlement Officer, Chatra for exclusion of the said land from the limits of the private protected forests on the ground that the same was a plain land and was fit for cultivation at a very small cost as the forest over the said area was not dense. The said application of Babu Krishna Ballabh Sahay was registered as Case No. 113/73 of 1949-50 and the Forest Settlement Officer, Chatra made an enquiry over the said claims of Babu Krishna Ballabh Sahay and passed an order dated 21.08.1949 for release of the said land from the limits of the private protected forest of Village-Bhaipur.
3. Thereafter, vide Hukumnama dated 17.05.1950, Babu Krishna Ballabh Sahay settled the said land in favour of his wife, Smt. Leela Devi @ Leelavati Devi at a fixed rent with Kayami Raiyati rights. The Settlee then regularly paid rent to the Tenure Holder/Zamindar against issuance of proper rent receipts. After the demise of the said Settlee, all her estates including the said land were jointly inherited by her legal heirs and successors i.e., her two sons, Arun Kumar Sinha and Pradeep Kumar Sinha on the application given by Arun Kumar Sinha. Jamabandi of the said land was opened in his name vide Case No. 08/1975-76 and thereafter he regularly paid rent to the government against issuance of proper rent receipts.
4. It is further submitted that Arun Kumar Sinha and Pradeep Kumar Sinha requested several times to the concerned authorities of the Forest Department to revise the map and publish a notification under Section 47 of the Act, 1947 in terms with order dated 21.08.1949 passed by the then Forest Settlement Officer, Chatra, District-Hazaribagh, however, the respondent authorities did not yield to their requests.
5. It is also submitted that the Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Ranchi vide letter no. 5417 dated 26.07.1984 addressed to the Special Secretary, Department of Forests & Environment, Government of Bihar, Patna, made recommendation for approval to release of the said land from the limits of the private protected forests of the Village-Bhaipur, Thana No. 119 and thereafter the Special Secretary, Department of Forests
The court established that the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 would not apply to land in respect of which the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 are in force.
The court reaffirmed that the notification under the Indian Forest Act validly vested land with the State, and the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside unchallenged notifica....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the power of the State Government to reserve forest land or wasteland under Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the consequences of vesti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the lack of jurisdiction of Consolidation Authorities over forest land notified under Section-4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the vesting of ....
The mandatory nature of service of notice under sub-Section 3 of Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and its significance in determining the classification of a land as a 'Private Forest' under....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.