Lalji Mahto vs Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 220

RAJESH SHANKAR
Lalji Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Mrs. Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Mr. Ankit Kumar Kumar, Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Mrs. Nirupama, Mr. Rajendra Krishna, Mr. Jay Shankar Tiwary, Mr. Ashish Kr Shekhar, Mr. Rajesh Kr Singh, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Ms. Sonal Jaiswal, Mr. Shrestha Gautam, Mr. Yogendra Yadav.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sachin Kumar, Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, Mr. Varun Prabahkar, Mr. Amit Kumar, Ms. Sugandha Khalkho, Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Mr. J.F. Toppo, Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku.

ORDER :

1. The present batch of writ petitions have been filed for quashing the respective resolutions issued to the petitioners, descriptions of which have been given in Column No. 6 of the table mentioned hereunder, whereby they have been communicated that the competent authority has taken decision to cancel their appointments made under the erstwhile Jharkhand State Electricity Board in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009 by way of absorption on the posts of Junior Electrical Engineer (General), Junior Electrical Engineer (G.T.O), Junior Engineer (Civil) and Assistant Electrical Engineer (General) and to revert them back to the initially appointed posts and have further been asked to file reply to the respective show cause notices.

2. The brief descriptions of the cases are as under:

1	2	3	4	5	6
Case No.	Petitioner	Post at the time of appointment with date	Promoted post with date	Presently the Post held	Impugned Resolution No. with date
W.P.(S) No.2903 of 2019	Lalji Mahto	Switchboard Operator Grade-II on 01.04.1991	Junior Electrical Engineer (Gene

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 220

RAJESH SHANKARLalji Mahto – AppellantVersusJharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

RAJESH SHANKAR
Lalji Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Respondent