RAJESH SHANKAR
Keshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in letter no. 410/D dated 09.11.2016 (Annexure-13 to the writ petition) issued by the Inspector General of Police (Training), Jharkhand, Ranchi, whereby Memorial Appeal filed by the petitioner has been rejected being time barred. Further prayer has been made for quashing the order as contained in memo no. 409/Go. dated 27.05.2016 (Anneuxure-11 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no. 4 – the Deputy Inspector General, Coal Range, Bokaro, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order passed by the respondent no. 5 – the Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad being the disciplinary authority has been dismissed. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the order as contained in memo no. 954/Go. dated 18.02.2015 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no. 5, whereby punishment of three black marks was imposed upon him (equivalent to forfeiture of two annual increments) observing that the same would not affect the future increment with a further direction to forfeit the salary and allowance payable to the petitioner for the dismissal period (i.e., 09.01.2004 to
Union of India & Others Vs. P. Gunasekaran
Chairman and Managing Director, V.S.P. & Others Vs. Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu
Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Ram Lal (2005) 2 SCC 638
State of Bihar v. Amrendra Kumar Mishra (2006) 12 SCC 561
State of Karnataka v. Ameerbi (2007) 11 SCC 681
State of M.P. v. Sanjay Kumar Pathak (2008) 1 SCC 456
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Surji Devi (2008) 2 SCC 310
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.