RAJESH SHANKAR
Subodh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo no.1749(ii) dated 22.09.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi- the respondent no.2, whereby the petitioner has been awarded major punishment of reduction of his basic pay to the initial stage of time scale of pay currently held by him.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Revenue Karamchari on 18.8.1978 and he superannuated from service on 04.01.2016. A criminal case was lodged against the petitioner being Vigilance Case No.25 of 2000 and he was sent to judicial custody on 15.07.2006. Consequently, he was put under suspension vide order as contained in memo no.1447(ii) dated 30.12.2006 and the memo of charge was issued to him containing following charges:-
(ii) The petitioner had issued the revenue receipt of Mauza-Hundru, P.S No. 224, Khata No. 360, Plot No. 1260 area 10.50 acr
Union of India & Others Vs. Dwarka Prasad Tiwari
Lucknow Kshetriya Gramin Bank & Another (Now Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank Vs. Rajendra Singh
Government authorities can cancel Jamabandi if opened without jurisdiction or through fraudulent means, safeguarding public interest over erroneous administrative actions.
Departmental inquiries must adhere to quasi-judicial standards, requiring evidence and witness examination to substantiate charges against an employee.
Government officials must act in accordance with legal mandates, and failure to do so, especially in corruption cases, justifies denial of bail and necessitates custodial interrogation.
Disciplinary authorities cannot impose both major and minor penalties simultaneously; violations of procedural propriety in inquiries can invalidate punitive actions.
The court upheld the dismissal of a government employee, affirming that the inquiry followed procedural norms and was free from bias, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review in departmental ....
The court ruled that disciplinary actions must consider the context of the employee's role and established procedures, emphasizing the need for fairness in departmental inquiries.
Disciplinary actions against a government employee must respect principles of natural justice and prior judicial orders, ensuring fairness and unbiased proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.