IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Adil @ Ahmad Kamal – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
A.B.A. Nos. 1682, 1851, 1940 of 2023
Decided On : 22-06-2023
Indian Penal Code ,1860 – Sections 467, 468, 415, 420, 120B, 506/34 – Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act – Section 3 – Offence of Cheating – Criminal Conspiracy – Common intention – Criminal intimidation – Anticipatory bail – Held, No public property has been damaged – Circle officer has also filed counter affidavit in this case and it is apparent that no government land is involved in this case as alleged in FIR – Petitioners have not cheated or conspired to cheat any person or government – Petitioners have no criminal antecedent – It appears that counter affidavit has been filed by concerned Circle Officer and other documentary evidence shows dispute between petitioner and his brother about the land – It is raiyat land – Claim of government, if any may be decide through civil action – Order accordingly
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023 instituted under Sections 467, 468, 415, 420, 120B, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, the petitioners have moved to this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
3. As per F.I.R. allegation is that accused persons were involved in filling a pond with earth and leveling it. It is further alleged that accused are plotting and making construction over the land and are selling the land of the pond in high price.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence at all rather they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that a false and fabricated case has been manipulated by the police intruding into the dispute between the brothers who are the owners of the disputed land. No public property has been damaged. Circle officer has also filed counter affidavit in this case and it is apparent that no government land is involved in this case as alleged in the FIR. Petitioners have not cheated or conspired to cheat any person or the government. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. It appears that counter affidavit has been filed by the concerned Circle Officer and other documentary evidence shows dispute between the petitioner and his brother about the land. It is raiyat land. Claim of government, if any may be decide through civil action.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of allegation coupled with materials on record, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Anticipatory bail granted based on lack of specific allegations against the petitioners.
The court favored anticipatory bail for the petitioners based on the absence of substantial evidence suggesting flight risk or criminal intent.
The court affirmed principles concerning anticipatory bail in forgery allegations, deeming the dispute civil in nature.
The judgment establishes criteria for anticipatory bail considering prior animosities and the nature of injuries involved.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are deemed false and the accused demonstrate willingness to cooperate with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail may be granted where the underlying dispute is of a civil nature and the accused demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the ongoing police investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.