IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Sahid Ansari, Son Of Jahruddin Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1.Heard the parties.
2. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.129 of 2024 registered under sections 126(2)/118(2)/109/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder Samina Bibi, Sadik Ansari, Rasidan Bibi, Parwez Ansari and Mushraf Ansari. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, Ranka P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024 was instituted and there was a free fight between the parties consequent upon commission of theft by the informant party. It is then submitted that the dispute is regarding plantation of paddy crop on 32 decimals of land having khata no. 20 being plot no. 220. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody and the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that the injuries sustained by the alleged vic
Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are deemed false and the accused demonstrate willingness to cooperate with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail can be granted based on the nature of allegations, non-serious injuries, and promises to cooperate with the investigation, particularly where co-accused were similarly given bail.
Court grants anticipatory bail to petitioners in a case alleging serious offences, emphasizing compliance with conditions and the non-interference with the informant.
Anticipatory bail granted based on lack of specific allegations against the petitioners.
The Court granted anticipatory bail based on insufficient evidence of specific involvement in the alleged offenses.
The court held that prior criminal antecedents do not automatically preclude anticipatory bail if subsequent developments indicate a lack of merit in the case.
The judgment establishes criteria for anticipatory bail considering prior animosities and the nature of injuries involved.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when allegations are vague, and similar relief has been provided to co-accused, provided that petitioners undertake cooperation with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when parties reach a compromise, with conditions ensuring dignity and cooperation in ongoing investigations.
The court highlighted the necessity for specific allegations to deny anticipatory bail, particularly amidst counterclaims and in cases of simple injuries.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.