SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1105

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Satya Narayan Basa, Son of Hemant Kr. Basa – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kumar Harsh.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Kumar Harsh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party- State of Jharkhand.

3. This Criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure arises out of Chakulia Shyam – Sundarpur P.S. Case No.24 of 2012 dated 21.03.2012 corresponding to G.R. Case No.117 of 2012 registered under Sections 414/420/34 IPC read with Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Section 26/33 of Indian Forest Act, 1972 said to be pending before the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ghatsila.

4. From the records of this case, it appears that vide order dated 16.10.2020 the petitioner had confined his relief to challenge to the order dated 12.08.2015 whereby the process under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. was issued and also challenge to order dated 15.10.2015 whereby process under Section 83 of Cr.P.C. was issued.

5. The petitioner had originally prayed for the following relief:

    (i) Quashing of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top