SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1419

NAVNEET KUMAR
Surendra Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment of conviction dated 16.10.2003 and order of sentence dated 22.10.2003 passed by the learned VIth Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Palamau at Daltonganj in Sessions Trial No. 44 of 1990 whereby and whereunder the aforesaid appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 395 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of 8 years.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that the informant P.W. 3 -Fatima Bibi stated before the police on 27.03.1989 at about 10.30 pm at Chainpur Police station in the District of Palamau at Daltonganj alleging therein that on the same date 27.03.1989 at about 8.30 pm when she along with her two daughter namely Ashma (P.W.4) and Sazda Begum (P.W. 2) were lying on bed, on seeing a man on her roof, she called Sarfoo, but in the meantime the said accused person jumped in her courtyard and opened the outer door of her house from inside providing opportunity to nine other accused persons to enter inside the house. She further alleged that the dacoits who jumped from her roof into her courtyard were armed with gun to whom she i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top