SUNITA AGARWAL, SADHNA RANI (THAKUR)
Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sadhna Rani (Thakur), J.
1. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 22.12.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.16, Meerut in S.T. Nos. 830 of 2002 (State Vs. Anangpal and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.103 of 2002, under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Sardhana, District Meerut.
2. By the impugned judgment and order, the learned trial court convicted and sentenced all the three appellants Jitendra, Bovinder and Amit under Section 147 I.P.C. for one year rigorous imprisonment each; under Section 148 I.P.C. for two years rigorous imprisonment each; under Sections 302/149 I.P.C. for life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5,000/-each and in default, all the three accused persons have to undergo additional imprisonment for three months; under Section 307/149 I.P.C. for seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5,000/-each and in default, accused persons have to undergo further simple imprisonment of three months.
3. Accused Anangpal was acquitted of the charges under Sections 120B/ 302 I.P.C by the same judgment in S.T. No. 831 of 2002 (State Vs. Bovinder and Another) and accused Bovinder and
Ankush Maruti Shinde and others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Anwar Hussain Vs. State of U.P.
Duryodhan Rout Vs. State of Orissa
Lakshman Singh Vs. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
Menoka Malik And Others Vs. State of West Bengal And Others
Radha Mohan Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Raj Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Rajesh Chandulal Gandhi and others Vs. State of Gujarat (2002) 4 SCC 426
State of M.P. v. Mansingh (2003) 10 SCC 414
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.