GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Prasad Sahu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Appellants are the plaintiffs and the appeal has been preferred against the Judgment of reversal passed by the District Judge, Latehar in T.A. No. 02 of 2008 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 10.03.2008 passed by the Munsif, Latehar in Title Suit No. 13/2004.
2. The parties shall be referred to by their original placement in the suit and will include their legal representatives substituted at different stages.
3. The plaintiffs brought the suit for declaration of the deeds of gift executed bearing No. 5561 dated 06.06.1980 and No.9564 dated 26.08.1988 executed by Adhikari Devi in favour of plaintiff No.1 were legal and valid and the plaintiff no.1 acquired valid right title, and possession over the same including the suit property. A further declaration has been sought that the Sale Deed no.1374 and 1375 both dated 25.08.1982 executed by Aashnandan Singh were void ab initio. The defendant be evicted from the suit premises and plaintiff no.1 be restored in possession.
4. The suit land comprises of two shop rooms and land enclosed with boundary situated in village Balumath under District Latehar in a total area of 0.12 acres out of which 0.10 acres was in C.S. Plo
Govt. of A.P. v. M. Krishnaveni
Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Govt. of India
D.N. Venkatarayappa v. State of Karnataka
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of gift deeds under the Transfer of Property Act, the Indian Evidence Act, and the inheritance of joint family property under the Hind....
An unregistered gift deed does not confer title to real property, necessitating proper registration and the inclusion of all necessary parties in a suit for declaration.
The burden of proof lies on the person asserting a fact until it is discharged, and no party can travel beyond its pleading.
The court held that the plaintiffs proved ownership through valid Sale Deed; defendants failed to substantiate adverse possession claims due to contradictions in evidence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove transfer of interest and permissive possession, and the limitation on becoming an owner by adverse possession if posses....
Possession under a void gift cannot lead to acquisition of title by adverse possession.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.