SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SUBHASH CHAND
Vishwanath Dayal Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, represented through General Manager, East Central Railway – Respondent
ORDER :
The instant writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred for quashing order dated 10.04.2019 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi in O.A. No. 329 of 2019 whereby his claim for appointment on compassionate ground has been dismissed on the ground of limitation.
2. Admitted case herein is that the father of the petitioner died in harness sometimes in the year 2002. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted representation before the respondents on 02.11.2022 which was rejected vide order dated 27.09.2005 but the writ petitioner did not challenge order dated 27.09.2005 fairly for a long period of 10-11 years and on 27.06.2016 filed another representation but when no decision was taken thereupon, the petitioner moved before learned Tribunal by filing O.A. No. 329 of 2019. The learned Tribunal, taking into consideration the fact that the application has been filed after lapse of 11 years has dismissed the original application, which is under challenge before this Court.
3. Law is well settled by taking into consideration the very object and intent of the appointment on compassionate ground, which is to be provided to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.