JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard Mr. Vikash Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Ms. Rakhi Sharma, Advocate.

2. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State.

3. Present criminal revision is directed against the judgment dated 25.02.2003, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Simdega in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 1992, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and the learned appellate court has confirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence of 2 years rigorous imprisonment dated 26.11.1992, passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Simdega in S.T. No. 209/90 (T.R. No. 114/91) for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner while assailing the impugned judgments has submitted that though there are concurrent findings recorded by the learned courts below, but the impugned judgments are perverse and call for interference. Learned counsel submits that the learned courts below have not properly considered the nature of injury which was a result of single blow on the head of t