JUDGMENT :

Heard Ms. Ritu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent State through V.C.

2. The instant interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner for modification of the order dated 29.01.2021; wherein at paragraph No.2, inadvertently, the prayer of one other similar case has been typed. Paragraph no. 2 of the order dated 29.01.2021 reads as under :

“2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though his case has been recommended for promotion by the Board of Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand on the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy.S.P.) in consonance with the procedure laid down in the Police Manual but an order dated 24.12.2000 (Annexure-2) has been issued by the Respondent No.4 whereby it has been informed to all concerned about the decision taken by the State Government for not granting any promotion in the services of the State Government till further decision taken by the State Government in this regard and due to the said order, the promotion of the petitioner could not be notified and the petitioner is going to retire on 31.01.2021.”

3. Ms. Ritu Kumar, learned counsel for the pet