SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Indicon Westfalia Limited – Appellant
Versus
Yogendra Nath Tiwary, s/o late Pandit Mahendra Nath Tiwary – Respondent
ORDER:
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.
The judgment in Original Suit No. 7 of 2017 passed by the Commercial Court at Dhanbad has been challenged by M/s INDICON Westfalia Limited (in short, defendant-company) by filing the present commercial appeal under section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
2. Original Suit No. 7 of 2017 was instituted for a money decree for Rs.1,77,39,940.96/- including taxes and interest @ 12% per annum w.e.f 1st January 2014. In the suit the plaintiff has examined himself as PW1 and laid in evidence work order vide Exhibit-1, amended work order vide Exhibit-2 and running bills and letter dated 23rd September 2013 to claim a money decree. Arindam Dutta who was the authorised signatory of the defendant-company was examined as DW1 and he has proved 20 documents including general and special conditions of contract, work order no. BW/KPO/002907/481/12-13/000681, original MOM dated 19th September 2012 etc. to resist the money claim made by the plaintiff, and to support the counter-claim to the tune of Rs. 31,19,727/-.
3. The plaintiff who is the respondent before us has pleaded that a work order dated 1st November 2012 was issued for execution of civil foundation w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.