SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ashok Medankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Amrita Kumari and Ms. Nehala Sharmin, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Mahavir Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
2. In both the petitions, common complaint case as well as orders are under challenge and in view of that, both the petitions are heard together with consent of the parties.
3. In both the petitions, the prayer is made for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in Complaint Case P.C.R. Case No.881/2016 including the order taking cognizance dated 05.06.2017, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar.
4. On 10.07.2017, these matters were taken up and notices were issued upon opposite party no.2 and on that day, the entire criminal proceeding was stayed and from time to time, the said order was extended. In the meantime, opposite party no.2 filed Criminal Revision No.73 of 2017, which was allowed vide order dated 26.05.2022 and remanded the matter to the learned Court to pass a fresh order and pursuant to that, further summoning order dated 08.08.2022 has been passed. In view of these developments, I.A. No.9979 of 2022 was filed for a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.