SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 81

M. V. MURALIDARAN
Mohit Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Munish Kochhar, Advocate, for the Petitioners; Mr. T. Rajendra, Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the Criminal Complaint Case No.55 of 2014 pending on the file of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Imphal East filed by the second respondent herein. The second respondent is the complainant in the Criminal Complaint Case.

2. Heard Mr. Munish Kochhar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. T. Rajendra, the learned counsel for the second respondent/ complainant.

3. Assailing the Criminal Complaint Case proceeding instituted by the second respondent against the petitioner before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Imphal East, Mr. Munish Kochhar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations made in the said complaint are vague as it mentions about various agreements with two different companies i.e. M/s.Mekaster International Private Limited and M/s.Mekaster Engineering Private Limited stated to have been entered into by the second respondent/complainant company at different times and on different dates without giving any specific clarification and background regarding agreements entered with each company and their re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top