PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Saryu Rajak, S/o Budhan Ram – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Giridih – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. All the above appeals arising out of common Judgment/Award, hence they are being taken together for hearing and disposal simultaneously. The appellants have preferred present appeals under Section 54 of the land acquisition Act, 1894 for setting aside the judgment dated 22nd December, 2017 in land acquisition reference case nos. 14/15, 15/15 & 16/15.
Background of these cases
3. The State Government through Special Land Acquisition Officer, Tenughat Project, Hazaribagh, vide mutation no. 24/2010-11 initiated proceeding for acquisition of land falling under village Gorhand, P.S. Dhanwar, District-Giridih appertaining to different khatas and plots admeasuring total 4.75 areas for construction of Panchkhero Jalashay Project. These awards prepared in the name of claimants by the special land acquisition officer, Tenughat Project, District Hazaribagh are being shown in the tabular chart as under:-
| Sl. No . | Reference Case no. | Khata/Plot No. | Type of land | Name of Awardee | Award No. | Area | Award value |
| 1. | L.A. Reference | ||||||
Haridwar Development Authority vs. Raghubir Singh & Ors. reported in (2010)11 SCC 581
Kasturi vs. State of Haryana (2003) 1 SCC 354
Maj. Gen. Kapil Mehra & Ors. vs. Union of India (UOI) & Anr. reported in 2015(2) SCC 262
Maj. Gen. Kapil Mehra vs Union of India (UOI) reported in 2015(2) JLJR 237 S.C.
Union of India v. Pramod Gupta (D) by LRs & Ors reported in AIR 2005 SC 3708
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.