SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR
NTPC Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rashtropati Ghosh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Soumen Sen, J.
These appeals are taken up together by consent of the parties for consideration, as these appeals are arising out of a common judgment and award passed by the learned Land Acquisition Judge at Burdwan arising out of reference cases being L.A. case no. 7/11, L.A. 6/11 and L.A. 8/11 respectively under Section 18 of Act 1 of 1894 of Land Acquisition Act.
The learned Land Acquisition Judge (in short L.A. Judge) modified the award passed by the LA Collector Burdwan by enhancing the market price of the acquired land of the petitioners from Rs.6000/- to Rs.8000/- per satak for Sali class of land.
The present appellants are the successor-in-interest of the original requiring body.
Briefly stated, vast acres of land measuring about 555.895 in the district of Burdwan situated at Mouja Srikhanda, Debkunda and Kashigram, P. S. Katwa was acquired on divers dated upon publication of Notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the purpose of Katwa Thermal Power Project. The land was acquired by the State of West Bengal for and on behalf of West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (In short "WBPDCL"), the original Requiring Body.
The notification
Anjani Molu Dessai v. State of Goa and Anr. (2010) 13 SCC 710
Chimanlal Hargovinddas v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust, Faridkot & Ors.
Major General Kapil Mehra & Ors. vs. Union of India
Mohammad Yusuf & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors. 2018 (16) SCC 105
Prabhakar Raghunath Patil & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Sabhia Mohammed Yusuf Abdul Mulla (D) by LRs & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer & Ors.
Sri Rani M. Vijayalakshmamma Rao Bahadur, Ranee of Vuyyur v. Collector of Madras
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Kashiram (dead) by L.Rs. & Ors. 2010 (14) SCC 506
State of Punjab and Anr. v. Hansraj (Dead) by L.Rs. Sohan Singh and Ors. (1994) 5 SCC 734
Subhram & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr. 2010 (1) SCC 444
Trishala Jain and Anr. v. State of Uttaranchal and Anr.
Union of India v. Raj Kumar Baghal Singh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles for determining the market value of acquired land, including the relevance of purpose of acquisition, deductions for ....
The market value of the land for the purpose of determining the compensation should be assessed by considering the smallness of the plot, the highest exemplar, and the purpose of acquisition, and by ....
(1) Acquisition of land – When large extent of lands are acquired and if sale exemplar, also for large extent is available on record it would be safer to rely on same if they are comparable transacti....
The market value of the acquired land can be determined by considering evidence such as sale deeds and witness testimonies, and making reasonable deductions for developmental costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.