Back
S. N. PATHAK
Deep Narayan Bauri – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Inspector General of Police, Rapid Action Force, CRPF, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for direction upon the respondents to quash the order dated 08.06.2019, passed by the Commandant No. 106 Bn. RAF, CRPF, Jamshedpur as well as order dated 03.10.2019, passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF (RAF), Dehradun, Uttarkhand.
Further, the petitioner prays for quashing the order dated NIL of month January, 2020, passed by the Inspector General of Police, Rapid Action Force, CRPF (RAF), New Delhi.
Petitioner has also prayed that after quashment of the aforesaid orders, a direction be given to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into services with all consequential benefits.
2. The case of the petitioner lies in a narrow compass. While the petitioner was working as Constable under the CRPF, show-cause notice was issued to him for the offence that he has solemnized 2nd marriage with one Reshma Devi during the lifetime of his 1st wife namely, Usha Devi. The petitioner submitted his reply stating therein that he was unaware of the provisions of Rule-11(1) of the CRPF and when he entered into an agreement of divorce from his 1st wife on 05.01.2016 he thought that now he is free to contract 2nd marriage a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for proportionality in the punishment imposed for violations of service rules, considering the individual circumstances and the impact on ....
The court ruled that while misconduct was established, the punishment of compulsory retirement was excessive and disproportionate, warranting judicial intervention.
penalty of removal from service on that ground was not shockingly disproportionate to charge on established judicial parameters. In view of the aforesaid decision, the judgment relied on by the petit....
Contracting a second marriage during the lifetime of the first wife by a government servant constitutes grave misconduct under the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules.
The main legal point established is that acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically invalidate a departmental inquiry, and unauthorized absence in a disciplined force can justify removal fro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
