SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 964

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Prem Ranjan, son of Late Niranjan Mahto and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Jharkhand State Staff Selection Commission, Government of Jharkhand, through its Chairman and Ors. – Respondents
L.P.A. No.146 Of 2019
Decided On : 08-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Ms. Tanya Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Mr. Prince Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Ranjan.
For the Intervenors : Mr. Chanchal Jain.

In case of doubt, the benefit should go to the Examination Authority rather than to the candidates.

Headnote:

Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination - Examination Cancellation - Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India - [Clause 13: “Question of language and literature subjects are in the same language and script or in Hindi/Devnagri script. Question of the rest of the subjects are in Hindi and English. In case of difference in any question in both versions, questions can be cancelled.”]

Fact of the Case:

The appeal challenges the rejection of the prayer for the cancellation of Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination held by Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission. The appellants alleged wrong and out of syllabus questions, and discriminatory nature of the examination process.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the questions asked did not prejudice the appellants and that the plea of questions being out of syllabus was not sustainable. The court also emphasized that in case of doubt, the benefit should go to the Examination Authority rather than to the candidates.

Issues: The main issues were the alleged wrong and out of syllabus questions, discriminatory nature of the examination process, and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the questions asked did not prejudice the appellants and that the plea of questions being out of syllabus was not sustainable. The court also emphasized that in case of doubt, the benefit should go to the Examination Authority rather than to the candidates.

Final Decision: The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed, and the application for making the intervenor as party appellants was also dismissed. The court concurred with the findings of the writ Court.

JUDGMENT :

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

1. This Letters Patent Appeal challenges the order dated 13.12.2018 passed by writ Court in W.P.(S) No.7363 of 2017 with W.P.(S) No.1423 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the prayer of appellants for cancelation of Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination held by Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through Advertisement No.21/2016 and reschedule of the said examination within stipulated time frame has been rejected by the writ Court.

Factual Matrix

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that Vide letter No.8280 dated 23.09.2016 and letter No.9441 dated 04.11.2016 issued by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, requisition were sent to Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) for starting selection process for appointment on the post of Combined Graduate Trained Teachers in different subjects for district wise vacancy lying in the State of Jharkhand amongst others, for the post of Assistant Teacher (Physical Education).

In pursuance to the aforesaid letters issued by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, the respondent Nos.1 & 2 published advertisement No.21/16 and online applications were invited. The syllabus was also described in the said advertisement.

3. The appellants are Graduate in different faculty like: Science, Commerce, Arts, Engineering and Physical Education etc. The appellants have submitted their online applications and online admit cards were also downloaded. The date of examination for physical education paper was scheduled to be held on 29.10.2017 and for compulsory paper (G.K. and Hindi Language) on 19.11.2017. The appellants appeared and participated in the said examination.

4. The process of recruitment involved single stage examination consisting of two papers i.e. Paper I-Compulsory Paper (G.K. and Hindi Language)-200 marks and Paper II-Optional Paper (Physical Education)-300 marks. Paper-I was qualifying in nature and securing minimum of 33 marks in the same was compulsory and paper-II (optional paper) consisted of 150 questions of 2 marks each and minimum qualifying marks was 50 % for the candidates belongs to General and OBC category and 45 % for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes. Paper II prescribed syllabus in three parts:

Part-A contains concept of Physical Education, Physiological Aspects of Physical Education, Physical Fitness and Wellness and Training Methods and Sociological Aspects of Physical Education;

Part-B History of the game/sports etc., latest general rules of the game/sports, measurement of play fields and specification of sports equipments and specifications of sports equipment; fundamental skills of the game/sports, related sports terminologies, important tournaments and venues, sports personalities, sports awards and

Part-C Health Education, Communicable Disease, Contemporary Health Problems, Healthful Living, Family Health Education and Prevention and First Aid for common sports injuries.

5. After conducting the examination, the JSSC uploaded the model answer key on its website and online objections/suggestions were also invited from the candidates from 02.11.2017 to 08.11.2017 and information to the aforesaid effect was also published in the Newspaper (Annexure-A). Thereafter, several candidates submitted their online objections/suggestions to the model answer before the JSSC.

6. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission after receipt of objections/suggestions from the candidates placed the same before experts for verification/corrections of the model answer in the light of the objections/suggestions of the candidates. After receiving the opinion of the experts about the model answer key subject wise in the light of the suggestions/objections of the candidates, the JSSC published the modified model answer key(Annexure-B) which is alleged to be binding to the JSSC.

7. The

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top