ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Angad Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Complaint Case No. 177 of 2020 including the order dated 14.06.2022 whereby the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur took cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner as well and further directed the office to issue summon, now pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner is the Operation Executive of Blue Dart Express Limited. M/s. Blue Dart Express Limited appointed the proprietorship firm of the complainant namely M/s. Vikash Enterprises as the pick-up and delivery agent for the said Courier Company after entering into an agreement in this respect on 30.06.2017. As per the claim of the complainant, M/s. Blue Dart Express Limited was to pay Rs.20,40,066/- to the said proprietorship firm of the complainant but M/s. Blue Dart Express Limited agreed to pay only Rs.13,80,772/- and ultimately paid Rs.2
Ajay Mitra v. State of M.P. (2003) 3 SCC 11 : 2003 SCC(Cri) 703
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours (P) Ltd.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma Vs. State of Bihar
Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. C.B.I., (2015) 4 SCC 609
Uma Shankar Gopalika vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.