IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
Kiran Lala @ Kiran Bala Lala, widow of late Shyama Kant Lala – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 1315 of 2006
Decided on : 13-06-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claiming title over property based on historical records. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute on maintainability of proceeding under bple act. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents assert land is government property following notification. (Para 9 , 10 , 19) |
| 4. petitioner's challenge to notification dated 23.11.1979. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's finding on the lack of bona fide claim by petitioner. (Para 21 , 35) |
| 6. dismissing of the writ petition due to lack of merits. (Para 36) |
| 7. advising petitioner to seek title declaration in civil court. (Para 38) |
| 8. final orders and conclusion of the court. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
(b). For quashing part of the Ex-parte Order dated 19.12.1988 [Annexure-24] passed in BPLE Case No.19 (IX) of 1981-82 passed by Anchal Adhikari, Baghmara -Cum- Collector under BPLE Act [Respondent No.5], with respect to land belonging to the Petitioner appertaining to the Plot No.768, Area: 0.13 decimal, of Mouza: Phularwartand No.31, Thana No.310, Khata No.01, Jamabandi No.269, Police Station: Baghmara, District: Dhanbad.
(c). For a further writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents from acting pursuant to the impugned Order dated 01.02.2006 [Annexure-32] passed in BPLE Appeal No.1 of 1989 by Respondent No.2 and impugned Order-dated 19.12.1988 [Annexure-24] passed in BPLE Case No.19 (ix) of 1981-82 by Respondent No.5 and restraining the Respondents from taking any steps for interfering with the possession of the Petitioner.”
Arguments of the Petitioner
3. Fact of the case as per the Petitioner : -
b. Kishundeo Singh was the Chaprasi [Guard] of the Zamindar. In the Year 1932, the Zamindar made Oral Raiyati Settlement of the entire Plot No.768, Area 0.26 Acres in Khata No. 1, Mouza Phularitand, Mouza No.310, P.S. Baghmara, District Dhanbad along with Plot No.850, Area 0.36 Acres of the said Mouza, i.e. Total 0.62 Acres, on raiyati terms on issuance of the rent receipt followed by delivery of possession over the said lands in favour of Kishundeo Singh. Kishundeo Singh constructed a small hut in a southern portion of Plot No.768 and started living therein with the members of his family and was also doing cultivation over the rest portion of the said lands. After death of Kishundeo Singh (chaprasi of the zamindar), his grand-daughter Smt. Phul Kumari Devi continued in possession over the said land and became raiyat and continued the cultivation over the said lands.
c. In order to give legality to said oral settlement, the zamindar issued a Hukumnama No.1762 dated 31.05.1952 [Annexure-3] in favour of Smt. Phul Kumari Devi [Grand-daughter of said Kishundeo Singh-the chaprasi of zamindar] who got her name mutated a
Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. Thummala Krishna Rao & Another
Kaikhosrou (Chick) Kavasji Framji and Another vs. Union of India & Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that summary proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 cannot be sustained when there is a longstanding possession and a bon....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.