SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1363

AMBUJ NATH
Birsa Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mrs. Nivedita Kundu, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P

JUDGMENT :

Petitioners Birsa Munda and Surju Pahan have filed this revision application against the judgment dated 20.05.2016, passed by Shri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa (As His Lordship was then), whereby and wherein, the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa partly allowed the appeal of the petitioners, by upholding the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.03.2016, passed by Shri Rama Kant Mishra, 1st Assistant Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Sessions Trial No. 69/2012 arising out of Bandgaon P.S. Case No. 31/2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 277/2011, holding the petitioners guilty of the offences under sections 25(1-A)/25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act and thereby sentencing them to undergo R.I for seven years along with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- for the offences under section 25(1-A)/35 of the Arms Act; R.I for two years along with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offences under section 25(1-B)a/35 of the Arms Act and R.I for five years along with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- for the offences under sections 26/35 of the Arms Act. In default of payment of fine, they were further directed to undergo S.I for one mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top