SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 160

DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Basant Raj Pandey for applicant; S.M. Patel, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision under section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C has been preferred by the applicant assailing the appeal judgment dated 10.01.2023 passed by IInd Addl. Sessions Judge to the Court of Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Cr.A.No.74/2022 (Vijay Singh v. State of M.P.) whereby applicant’s conviction for commission of offence under section 25(1-b)(a) of Arms Act and sentence of 1 year RI with fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation by the learned JMFC, Tikamgarh vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.4.2022 passed in Criminal Case No.15202274/2014, has been affirmed.

2. As per the prosecution story on 5.11.2014 Sub Inspector Mansharam Bagen of P.S. Mohangarh during his beat visit received secret information that Vijay Singh s/o Govind Singh armed with illegal country made pistol at village Jagatnagar is threatening to public at large. At this, he alongwith witnesses and police force reached on the spot encircled and apprehended accused Vijay Singh. In search, one 12 bore country made pistol alongwith one 12 bore live cartridge was seized from shirt and pant worn by him. He was asked to produce the license for possessing the same but he co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top