JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. Notice has validly been served upon the respondent no.4. Hence, service of the notice upon the respondent no.4 is sufficient.

3. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue of appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to quash the order dated 12.04.2016 passed in S.A.R. Appeal No.52R 15/2014-15 passed by the respondent no.2-Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi whereby and where under, the order passed by the S.A.R. Officer, Ranchi in S.A.R. Case No.306 of 2012-13; whereby the land, which is the subject matter of the appeal concerned, has been directed to be restored in favour of the pro-forma respondent of the appeal.

4. The brief fact of the case is that the respondent filed a petition under Section 71A of Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 in the court of S.A.R. Officer, Ranchi being the respondent no.3 of this writ petition for restoration of the land measuring 2 katha of Mouza-Hehal, P.S.-Sukhdeonagar, Thana No.203, Khata No.80, plot no. 1517, Dist.-Ranchi alleging that the same has been occupied by the petitioner forcibly and the petitioner has been claiming that he is the