JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. Since both the appeals arise out of the common order, as such they are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common order.

Prayer:

2. Both the instant intra-court appeals, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, are directed against order/judgment dated 31.10.2014 passed by learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 72 of 1999(R) with C.W.J.C. No. 74 of 1999(R), whereby and whereunder the original order dated 03.05.1995 passed in L.C. Case No. 11-12 of 1994-95 by the Land Reform Deputy Collector, Daltonganj; order dated 23.11.1995 in L.C. Appeal No. 01 and 02 of 1995-96 and order dated 06.10.1998 passed by the Additional Member, Board of Revenue in L.C. Revision Case No. 321 and 322 of 1995 have been quashed and set aside by allowing the writ petition.

Brief facts of the case:

3. Brief facts of the case, as per the pleadings made in the writ petitions, read as under:

4. The respondent no. 6 executed two sale deeds being sale deed no. 2392 dated 24.03.1992, registered on 25.05.1994 in favour of the petitioner Urmila Devi [ subject matter of C.W. J.C. No. 72 of 1999 (R)] and sale deed no. 2393 dated 24.03.1992, registered on 25.05.19