SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Mangra Kujur, S/o. Late Somra Kujur – Appellant
Versus
Gopi Kujur, S/o. Late Sukra Oraon – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant petition is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder the order dated 25.11.2019 passed in Partition Suit No.418 of 2016 by learned Sub-Judge-X, Ranchi has been assailed by which the petition dated 18.02.2019 filed under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected.
2. As per the case of the petitioner, a partition suit was filed for partition of their ancestral property. During the pendency of the partition suit, the co-sharers have entered into a compromise based upon the settlement.
3. The same has been brought to the notice of the learned court. The learned trial court on the basis of that settlement, has passed the judgment based upon that the decree was also passed.
4. As per the petitioner, in the judgment, the following typographical errors have been crept up :-
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr. Vrs. Rajendra Shankar Patii
Mani Nariman Daruwala Vrs. Phiroz N. Bhatena
Laxmikant Revchand Bhojwani Vrs. Pratapsing Mohansingh Pardeshi
Telangana Housing Board v. Azamunnisa Begum
Master Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Vipinchandra Vadilal Bavishi v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.