DEEPAK ROSHAN
Murari Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs:
(i) Pay and allowance for the duty post of Superintending Engineer from 2.8.2002 to 19.7.2007 excluding the pay and allowance already paid for the duty post of Executive Engineer;
(ii) Pay and allowance for the duty post of Chief Engineer from 20.7.2007 to 23.12.2018 excluding the pay and allowance already paid to the petitioner for the duty post of Executive Engineer from 20.7.2007 to 7.7.2014 and for the duty post of Superintending Engineer from
The said judgment also relied the case of State of Punjab and another versus Dharam Pal
Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648
State of Punjab and another versus Dharam Pal
Secretary-cum-Chief Engineer, Chandigarh v. Hari Om Sharma and Others
Government employees are entitled to pay and allowances for higher posts they have officiated, as per the Jharkhand Service Code, and departmental memos cannot negate this entitlement.
An employee discharging duties of a higher post is entitled to pay and allowances for that position, regardless of the absence of formal promotion orders. Delay in processing claims does not nullify ....
Retired employees in in-charge positions are entitled to regularization and benefits as per their service status at retirement.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.