SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 320

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. PATHAK, J.
Satya Narayan Tiwary and Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 732 of 2018, With W.P.(S) No. 2922 of 2018, With W.P.(S) No. 5861 of 2018, With W.P.(S) No. 5986 of 2018, With W.P.(S) No. 100 of 2016, With W.P.(S) No. 642 of 2018.
Decided On : 17-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Tandon, Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Mr. Adamya Kerketta, Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Mr. Virendra Kumar, Mr. Abhay Kishore.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sachin Kumar, Addl. A.G.-II; Mr. Prabhat Kumar, SC-II; Mr. Ravi Kerketta, SC-VI; Ms. Surabhi, AC to AAG-II; Mr. Piyush Anand, AC to SC-VI; Mr. Rohit, AC to AAG-I; Ms. Surabhi Rani, AC to SC-II; Mr. Abhinay Kumar, AC to GA-I; Mr. Ashok Kr Singh, AC to SC(L&C)-II; Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Adv.; Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv.; Ms. Richa Sanchita, Adv., Ms. Pinky Shaw, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the annulment of pensionary benefits without adherence to constitutional requirements and without justifiable reasons is arbitrary and unconstitutional, violating the accrued rights of employees.

Headnote:

[PENSION] - [Pension and Gratuity Entitlement for Employees of Madarsas and Sanskrit Schools] - [Jharkhand Pension Rules, Article 166 of the Constitution of India] - [The court discussed the validity of the impugned Resolution No. 1773 dated 21.06.2018, which annulled the earlier Resolution No. 2020 dated 24.10.2014 that granted pension and gratuity to employees of recognized Madarsas and Sanskrit schools. The court emphasized that the annulment was not expressed in the name of the Governor as required by Article 166, rendering it unconstitutional. The court highlighted that accrued rights cannot be unilaterally revoked without proper justification, and the classification created by the state was arbitrary and discriminatory.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the annulment of Resolution No. 2020 dated 24.10.2014, which entitled employees of recognized Madarsas and Sanskrit schools to pension and gratuity. The impugned Resolution No. 1773 dated 21.06.2018 revoked these benefits, affecting numerous employees who had retired or were about to retire.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the impugned resolution was issued without following the constitutional requirement of being expressed in the name of the Governor, thus lacking legal validity. The court held that the rights accrued to the employees under the previous resolution could not be taken away unilaterally and that the state had failed to provide a rational basis for the classification created by the annulment.

Issues: Whether the annulment of pension and gratuity benefits through Resolution No. 1773 was valid given the constitutional requirements and whether the rights accrued to the employees could be revoked without justification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the impugned resolution was unconstitutional as it did not comply with Article 166 of the Constitution, which mandates that all executive actions of the government must be expressed in the name of the Governor. The court also established that accrued rights cannot be revoked without proper justification, and arbitrary classifications violate the principles of equality under Article 14.

Final Decision: The court quashed Resolution No. 1773 dated 21.06.2018, reinstated the pension and gratuity benefits for the petitioners, and ordered the state to calculate and pay the benefits within three months.

JUDGMENT :

S.N. PATHAK, J.

The issues involved in these writ petitions are common and hence the same have been heard together and being disposed of analogously. Since in all these writ petitions, almost the same facts are there and hence for the purpose of convenience, the facts of W.P.(S) No. 5861 of 2018, titled as ‘Jharkhand Pradesh Madarsa-Sanskrit Sikshak Sawanmay Samiti & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.’ are being taken into consideration.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Addl. Advocate General as well as other learned counsel representing the respondent-State, as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Accountant General.

Prayers

3. The petitioners have thrown challenge to Resolution No. 1773 dated 21.06.2018 issued under the pen and signature of the Additional Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, whereby the earlier Resolution No. 2020 dated 24.10.2014 by which the employees of 186 recognised Non-Government Madarsas and 12 recognized Non-Government Aided Sanskrit Schools, appointed on or before 30.11.2004 were made entitled to receive pension / gratuity, has been cancelled / annulled. A further prayer has been made to declare that the Resolution No. 2020 dated 24.01.2014 issued by the order of the Governor of Jharkhand is valid, constitutional, in consonance with the provisions enshrined in Jharkhand Pension Rules and even otherwise the same is in accordance with law and hence, the respondents are duty bound to abide by Resolution dated 24.10.2014. The petitioners have further prayed to hold and declare that employees of recognised non-Government Aided Madarsas and Sanskrit Schools are entitled for pension / gratuity on their retirement, if they were appointed on or before 30.11.2004 and the respondents are duty bound to pay pensionery benefits to such retired employees. The Facts.

4. The facts pleaded in W.P.(S) No. 5861 of 2018 are that the petitioner No.1 is unregistered Samiti of employees of Madarsa and Sanskrit schools; petitioner no.2 is an employee of Madarsa Hussainia Tajweedul Quran, Dighi in the district of Godda; petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are the employees of Ramyasho Ray Sanskrit High School, Madhupur, Deoghar; and petitioner no. 5 is a registered Association under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Similarly petitioner no. 6 is himself an employee of Madarsa Sajjadia Kajru Kalan, Pandu, Palamau. The facts further revealed that there are total 186 Madarsas, which were fully funded by the Government, functioning in the State of Jharkhand. Similarly there are 12 Sanskrit Schools located in the entire State of Jharkhand, which are fully funded by the Government of Jharkhand, though these are non-Government Organizations, but these are recognised (with finance) by the State of Jharkhand. Salaries and other benefits like pay revision etc. in respect of employees of these schools are done and decided by the Government of Jharkhand at par with the employees of the Government schools located in the State of Jharkhand. Right from their appointment in undivided State of Bihar, the petitioners were getting the benefits at par with the employees of Government schools. Time to time, the pay of the employees of these Madarsas and Sanskrit schools are revised on the basis of recommendation of Pay Revision Commission’s report. In support of their pleadings, they have annexed Resolution No. 2956 dated 25.11.2011, whereby the pay of the employees of these 186 Madarsas and 12 Sanskrit schools were revised with effect from 01.01.2006 under 6th PRC. The petitioners have further pleaded that employees of non-Government Minority Schools are getting the pensionery benefits vide Resolution No. 284 dated 03.02.2012 issued by the Human Resource Development Department (now known as School Education and Literacy Department), Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. Even the employees of minority colleges located in the entire State of Jharkhand ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top