SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Asit C. Mehta Investment Intermediates Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh along with Mr. Onkar Nath Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in Cr.M.P. Nos. 1241 of 2016 and Cr.M.P. No. 669 of 2008, Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Mr. Navin Kumar Singh and Mr. Jitendra Pandey, learned A.P.Ps. for the State in respective cases and Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Rishav Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2.
2. Nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 889 of 2008, that’s why, this petition is being heard on merits in absence of the petitioner.
Cr.M.P. No. 1241 of 2016
3. In this petition prayer is made for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the order taking cognizance dated 21.01.2016, by which cognizance for the offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 and Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner Nos. 4 and 5, in connection with P.C.R. Case No. 192 of 2010 (T.R. No. 387 of 2016), pending in the court of learned Chief J
Amar Singh Versus Union of India & Ors.
Arunima Baruah v. Union of India
Buddhi Kota Subbarai (Dr.) v. K. Parasaran
Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Prestige Lights Limited v. State Bank of India
R.K. Vijayasarathy v. Sudha Seetharam
S.K. Goel & Ors. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Trisuns Chemical Industry v. Rajesh Agarwal
Uma Shankar Gopalika v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.