S. N. PATHAK
Krishna Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.N. PATHAK, J.
In all these writ petitions, common questions of law are involved and the facts are also almost similar, as such, they are heard together and are being decided by this common order with the consent of the parties.
2. Heard the parties.
Prayer
3. The petitioners have challenged their penalty orders, appellate orders and the revisional orders passed by the disciplinary authority, appellate authority and revisional authority respectively.
4. In W.P.(S) No. 1889 of 2021, the penalty order contained in District Order No. 4195/2019 dated 30.8.2019 (Annexure-6) is under challenge. The appellate order contained in Memo No. 1378 dated 27.4.2020 (Annexure-8) and the revisional order contained in Memo No. 242 dated 28.12.2020 (Annexure-10) are also under challenge.
5. In W.P.(S) No. 1917 of 2021, the penalty order contained in District Order No. 4195/2019 dated 30.8.2019 (Annexure-6), appellate order contained in Memo No. 1376 dated 27.4.2020 (Annexure-8) and the revisional order contained in Memo No. 229 dated 14.12.2020 (Annexure-10) are under challenge.
6. Similarly, in W.P.(S) No. 1636 of 2021, the penalty order contained in District Order No. 4193/2019 dated 30.8.2019
Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors. Vs. Jai Bhagwan
Hardwari Lal Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
Inspector General of Police v. S. Samuthiram
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and Ors.
Secretary, Managing Committee, BSM(PG) College, Roorkee Vs. Samrat Sharma and others
Samar Bahadur Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.