IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, JJ.
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka S/o Late Dwarika Prasad – Respondent
Acquittal Appeal No. 09 of 2006
Decided On : 09-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. acquittal judgment background and events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments on the prosecution's case and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. witness testimony and its evaluation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. young witness reliability and familial relations. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. identification of accused and its robustness. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. principles regarding witness identification. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. confession and rights of the accused. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. legal standards for evidence and confession. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. rights of the accused and implications of confession. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. evidential standards of confession and discovery. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. credibility of hostile witnesses. (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. assessment of evidence against the accused. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 13. gang killing and conspiracy evaluation. (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 14. conspiracy elements and evidence. (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 15. final judgment rationale and conviction. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 16. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT :
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.
1. The State of Jharkhand has challenged the judgment dated 22nd December 2005 in Sessions Trial Nos. 17 of 2005 and 96 of 2005, by which Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka, P. Chhanda Rao @ Dolly, Md. Akhtar, Satpal Singh @ Mithu Paji, Raju Podwal @ Raju Das, Sushil Kumar Jha @ Pappu Jha, Mohan Gupta, and Ravi Chourasia have been acquitted from the charge framed against them under sections 302/34 and 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE for committing murder of P. Ratna Rao @ Joni in furtherance of common intention and conspiracy. Raju Podwal @ Raju Das has been acquitted also of the charge under section 27 of the ARMS ACT .
2. On 19th June 2004, at about 09:00 AM, P. Ramchandra Rao who is the father of Joni gave his fardbeyan before the officer-in-charge of Sitaramdera PS at his house situated at 22 New Layout within Sitaramdera PS. According to him, two boys one of whom was of average build came near his house and made some inquiry from Dolly and, in the meantime, the other boy fired shot at his son – the shooter was a tall boy. The assailants thereafter fled away towards the northern side on a motorcycle which was held by a third boy in starting position, just away from the place of occurrence. On the basis of his statement, Sitaramdera PS Case No. 41 of 2004 was lodged against unknown on the same day. The investigating officer prepared inquest report and collected blood-stained soil from the place of occurrence, blood stains from sheet cover of Maruti Esteem car, and the blood-stained shirt of the deceased. Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka and Dolly were arrested the same day and Chhotka made disclosures which unfolded the conspiracy hatched by him.
3. Soon thereafter, Md. Akhtar who according to the prosecution was standing with a motorcycle about 20 yards from the place of occurrence, was arrested on 25th June 2004. Later on, Mohan Gupta who is the person who came near Joni on the pretext of enquiring about an address was arrested on 1st July 2004, and on the same day he made disclosures before the police and on his pointing a blood-stained shirt and jeans pant were recovered from his house. Raju Podwal @ Raju Das who is the shooter was arrested on 11th October 2004 and on the basis of his confessional statement recorded around 02:40 PM on 11th October 2004, a county-made firearm was recovered from a house at Chayanagar concealed within the earth and a seizure memo was prepared in the presence of Dulal Chandra Karmar and Jugal Bhuiyan. He made another disclosure on 18th October 2004 on the basis of which a fired .315 bore cartridge was recovered in the presence of Vijay Sao and Deo Chand Pandit.
4. Dr. Lalan Chaudhary who conducted autopsy over the dead body found the following antemortem injuries on the person of Joni:
Bhajju v. State of M.P. (2012) 4 SCC 327
Bodhraj alias Bodha v. State of J&K
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State of Gujarat
Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar
Jayantilal Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Malkhansingh v. State of M.P. (2003) 5 SCC 746
Mano Dutt v. State of U.P. (2012) 4 SCC 79
Mir Mohd. Omar v. State of West Bengal
Mohamed Sugal Esa Mamasan Rer Alalah v. King AIR 1946 PC 3
Mrinal Das v. State of Tripura
Munish Mubar v. State of Haryana
Praphulla Kumar Sarkar v. Emperor
Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor
Raja Ram Yadav v. State of Bihar
Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Simon and Others v. State of Karnataka
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Sunil
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mast Ram
Subedar Tewari v. State of U.P. 1989 Supp1 SCC 91
Murder conviction upheld on eye-witness testimony of coordinated sharp weapon and firearm assault, corroborated by medical/ballistic evidence and circumstances; weapon recovery under Evidence Act Sec....
The court upheld convictions for murder and conspiracy despite reliance on circumstantial evidence, finding sufficient connections through uncorroborated testimony and addressing potential political ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.