SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, JJ.
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka S/o Late Dwarika Prasad – Respondent
Acquittal Appeal No. 09 of 2006
Decided On : 09-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vandana Bharti.
For the Respondents: Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Naveen Kumar Jaiswal, M.A. Niyazi, Prince Kumar, Sanjoy Piprawall, Sajid Yunus, Ayub Ansari.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302/34 and 120-B - Acquittal appeal challenged by State for acquittal judgment dated 22nd December 2005 against accused for murder and conspiracy - The trial court acquitted defendants due to lack of evidence directly connecting them to the crime or proving conspiracy. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 30 - Confessions made to police inadmissible against co-accused unless corroborated - Prosecution failed to establish conspiracy and common intention beyond reasonable doubt; mere motive does not suffice for conviction. (Paras 46-56)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to kill the deceased due to intervening love affairs, but the evidence was deemed insufficient to uphold charges.

Findings of Court:
The Court found the acquittal to be justified, emphasizing the lack of direct or corroborative evidence.

Issues: The main issues were whether the evidence sufficiently established conspiracy or direct involvement in the murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that absence of conclusive evidence against the accused justified their acquittal, specifically noting that mere suspicion and motive are inadequate for conviction.

Result: Appeals dismissed; accused acquitted.

Table of Content
1. acquittal judgment background and events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments on the prosecution's case and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. witness testimony and its evaluation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. young witness reliability and familial relations. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. identification of accused and its robustness. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
6. principles regarding witness identification. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
7. confession and rights of the accused. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
8. legal standards for evidence and confession. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
9. rights of the accused and implications of confession. (Para 41 , 42 , 43)
10. evidential standards of confession and discovery. (Para 44 , 45 , 46)
11. credibility of hostile witnesses. (Para 47 , 48 , 49)
12. assessment of evidence against the accused. (Para 50 , 51 , 52)
13. gang killing and conspiracy evaluation. (Para 53 , 54 , 55)
14. conspiracy elements and evidence. (Para 56 , 57 , 58)
15. final judgment rationale and conviction. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)
16. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 63 , 64 , 65)

JUDGMENT :

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.

1. The State of Jharkhand has challenged the judgment dated 22nd December 2005 in Sessions Trial Nos. 17 of 2005 and 96 of 2005, by which Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka, P. Chhanda Rao @ Dolly, Md. Akhtar, Satpal Singh @ Mithu Paji, Raju Podwal @ Raju Das, Sushil Kumar Jha @ Pappu Jha, Mohan Gupta, and Ravi Chourasia have been acquitted from the charge framed against them under sections 302/34 and 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE for committing murder of P. Ratna Rao @ Joni in furtherance of common intention and conspiracy. Raju Podwal @ Raju Das has been acquitted also of the charge under section 27 of the ARMS ACT .

2. On 19th June 2004, at about 09:00 AM, P. Ramchandra Rao who is the father of Joni gave his fardbeyan before the officer-in-charge of Sitaramdera PS at his house situated at 22 New Layout within Sitaramdera PS. According to him, two boys one of whom was of average build came near his house and made some inquiry from Dolly and, in the meantime, the other boy fired shot at his son – the shooter was a tall boy. The assailants thereafter fled away towards the northern side on a motorcycle which was held by a third boy in starting position, just away from the place of occurrence. On the basis of his statement, Sitaramdera PS Case No. 41 of 2004 was lodged against unknown on the same day. The investigating officer prepared inquest report and collected blood-stained soil from the place of occurrence, blood stains from sheet cover of Maruti Esteem car, and the blood-stained shirt of the deceased. Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka and Dolly were arrested the same day and Chhotka made disclosures which unfolded the conspiracy hatched by him.

3. Soon thereafter, Md. Akhtar who according to the prosecution was standing with a motorcycle about 20 yards from the place of occurrence, was arrested on 25th June 2004. Later on, Mohan Gupta who is the person who came near Joni on the pretext of enquiring about an address was arrested on 1st July 2004, and on the same day he made disclosures before the police and on his pointing a blood-stained shirt and jeans pant were recovered from his house. Raju Podwal @ Raju Das who is the shooter was arrested on 11th October 2004 and on the basis of his confessional statement recorded around 02:40 PM on 11th October 2004, a county-made firearm was recovered from a house at Chayanagar concealed within the earth and a seizure memo was prepared in the presence of Dulal Chandra Karmar and Jugal Bhuiyan. He made another disclosure on 18th October 2004 on the basis of which a fired .315 bore cartridge was recovered in the presence of Vijay Sao and Deo Chand Pandit.

4. Dr. Lalan Chaudhary who conducted autopsy over the dead body found the following antemortem injuries on the person of Joni:

    (i) Semi-circular stitched wound of size 23.5 c.m. with 23 stitches ov

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top