SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Chhotka S/o Late Dwarika Prasad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. acquittal judgment background and events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments on the prosecution's case and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. witness testimony and its evaluation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. young witness reliability and familial relations. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. identification of accused and its robustness. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. principles regarding witness identification. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. confession and rights of the accused. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. legal standards for evidence and confession. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. rights of the accused and implications of confession. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. evidential standards of confession and discovery. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. credibility of hostile witnesses. (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. assessment of evidence against the accused. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 13. gang killing and conspiracy evaluation. (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 14. conspiracy elements and evidence. (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 15. final judgment rationale and conviction. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 16. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT :
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.
1. The State of Jharkhand has
Bhajju v. State of M.P. (2012) 4 SCC 327
Bodhraj alias Bodha v. State of J&K
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State of Gujarat
Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar
Jayantilal Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Malkhansingh v. State of M.P. (2003) 5 SCC 746
Mano Dutt v. State of U.P. (2012) 4 SCC 79
Mir Mohd. Omar v. State of West Bengal
Mohamed Sugal Esa Mamasan Rer Alalah v. King AIR 1946 PC 3
Mrinal Das v. State of Tripura
Munish Mubar v. State of Haryana
Praphulla Kumar Sarkar v. Emperor
Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor
Raja Ram Yadav v. State of Bihar
Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Simon and Others v. State of Karnataka
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Sunil
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mast Ram
Subedar Tewari v. State of U.P. 1989 Supp1 SCC 91
Murder conviction upheld on eye-witness testimony of coordinated sharp weapon and firearm assault, corroborated by medical/ballistic evidence and circumstances; weapon recovery under Evidence Act Sec....
The court upheld convictions for murder and conspiracy despite reliance on circumstantial evidence, finding sufficient connections through uncorroborated testimony and addressing potential political ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.