SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1498

SANJAY PRASAD
Sushma Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar Roy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Prashant Pallav.
For the Respondent: Rajesh Kumar,

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY PRASAD, J.

1. Both the Criminal Revision No. 656 of 2020 and Criminal Revision No. 22 of 2020 have been heard together and are being disposed of together as they arise of the common ‘Order’ dated 17.12.2019 passed in Original Maintenance Case No. 229 of 2017 filed under section 125 Cr.P.C by the wife and son (i.e. petitioner in Cr. Revision No. 22 of 2020 and opposite party no. 1 and 2 in Cr. Revision No. 656 of 2020) against the husband i.e. petitioner in Cr. Revision No. 656 of 2020 and opposite party in Cr. Revision No. 22 of 2020 by which the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro has directed the husband to pay Rs.15,000/- and Rs.5,000/- total Rs.20,000/- per month to the wife (i.e. petitioner in Cr. Revision No. 22 of 2020 and opposite party no. 1 and 2 in Cr. Revision No. 656 of 2020) with effect from 17.12.2019 i.e. the date of passing of the order.

It has further been directed that the daughter shall be entitled to get the said maintenance amount till her marriage, and interim maintenance ordered by the Family Court on 16.03.2019 is effective till 16.12.2019.

2. The petitioners, who have filed Cr. Revision No. 22 of 2020, are wife and minor daughter of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top